Sunday, January 13, 2008

Say "yes" to nuclear power

5 Myths About Breaking Our Foreign Oil Habit, posted Jan. 13 on "A Chequer-Board of Nights and Days," talks about the important issues and possible problems that will face our nation. The blog asks why no presidential candidates will make remarks concerning these issues considering their large importance. In saying how important it is to address the issues faced by our country concerning foreign oil, the blogger came up with two points that he wanted to make, one of which I whole heartedly agree with, but the other I'm not so sure about. First, he says that America needs to build more nuclear power plants to address power shortages. Second, he says that to keep everyday products like foods at reasonable prices, we should invest in ethanol. I find myself more skeptical of the latter of these two points because I don't feel that ethanol will be a useful, long-lasting solution to raising oil prices. I have reached this conclusion because ethanol still takes lots of power and oil to make. Because of this, I see solutions such as ethanol and hybrid cars as non-practical solutions because they don't actually fix the problems, but only delay the inevitable. The problem is, though, that I have no idea or solution that can do any better than these ideas, so I am in no real position to attack these ideas to answer oil problems. But, concerning the first point the blogger made, I think that more nuclear plants are a must; building more nuclear plants is something that America should already have done years ago. I am a strong believer of this because, despite the way many environmentalist make them sound horrible, nuclear power plants are by far the cleanest and most efficient form of power. Although the US was the first nation to harness nuclear power, European countries have far surpassed the number of nuclear plants in America because they seem to see the obvious practicality and use of it. The problem is that there have been incidents or scares, such as Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, that have given the public a scare and they have made people more willing to believe environmentalists against nuclear power plants after hearing about these things. In short, I'm not sure of how to solve our oil and power problems completely in America, but building more nuclear power plants would be a long overdue step in the right direction.

4 comments:

DiverDan said...

Dude, im totally for you when it comes to Nuclear power. That would be a great thing for the us. With the ethanol and gas issue, maybe using ethanol wouldn't be a total fix. But, it might put a delay on global warming and decrease our dependency on foreign oil.But just like you i am no expert with these issues so my word really may have no wight.

Nathan M. said...

Although there are still debates about what to do with spent fuel from nuclear power plants, I agree that they are a good way to generate power. On the subject of Ethanol, I disagree that investing in ethanol will keep food prices down. It is more profitable now for farmers to grow corn for ethanol with their land than corn for food or even cattle feed so that is actually driving corn-based food prices up.

Caitlin.mcgill said...

I agree with Dan in saying that while ethanol won't be a total fix, it does help us substantially. Increasing the use of Nuclear plants is a good idea as well, but the risk of this technology is that it can easily be used for evil. Once the basic technology of nuclear power plants spread, terrorists and other threatening world actors could use it for bad. That is not to say we shouldn't take advantage of it, but just be extra cautious.

Carson Lee said...

I agree with the opinion about nuclear power as well. As you mentioned, nuclear power is not only clean but efficient, and addition to being one of the safer types of producing energy... if cared for properly. Although we all know how catastrophic it will be when accidents happens in nuclear power plants or when it breaks down, nuclear power plants are on average, more safe than what we have today in relation to its power production capability. (Coal plants triggers fires often, and solar/wind power plants don't produce as much).

So yes to nuclear power.